Wednesday, November 02, 2011

SHOULD THE CARDINALS RE-SIGN ALBERT PUHOLS?

No.

7 comments:

Brian's Bibilcial Minute said...

Are you really serious? I love Pujols!

Terry Rush said...

I love Puhols, too, Brian.

However, I don't want to give him long-term millions upon millions with possibly a breakdown in health about half-way through.

Negative? No, positive (smiling)that paying so much to one team player when that player is subject to injury on any one play isn't a good idea!

James Riley said...

I don't think they should re-sign Albert Puhols, but they should re-sign Albert Pujols! At first, I thought it was a trick question, until I read the comments! Oddly enough, the word verification for my comment is "unsinde"... no kidding!

Terry Rush said...

James,

Now that's almost prophetically too weird, huh?

Anonymous said...

You're right....typically giving one player soooo much money doesn't work out for either side. Just can't live up to it. However, I don't think any other team will give him substantially so much more than the Cards offer, so he'll probably stay there.

Jay

Anonymous said...

You're right....typically giving one player soooo much money doesn't work out for either side. Just can't live up to it. However, I don't think any other team will give him substantially so much more than the Cards offer, so he'll probably stay there, almost by default.

Jay

Brian's Bibilcial Minute said...

ummm! I see your point.

Curious as to how this paid difference would work in a church setting: Preaching ministers Vs. Youth Ministers Vs. Worship Ministers Vs. ....

Thoughts?